Constants

Named analytic constants — Golomb–Dickman, a Poisson–Dirichlet spectrum, Artin — as the solvency thresholds of designed growth economies.

The self-growing tower's asymptotics run on one estimate — the density of transparent steps (Growth) — and its dynamical complexity has an exact ledger in the shifted primes p − 1 (the complexity ledger). What happens when a growth fate is designed to have a numerical threshold? Overlay on the primorial schedule a reserve that earns ρ log p at each prime and pays a chosen cost w(p) ≥ 0:

R(k) = ρ·θ(pk) − Σik w(pi),  θ(x) = Σpx log p.

Whether the reserve thrives or sinks is decided by a single number, and the numbers that appear are the analytic-prime-constant zoo. Every in-range value below is at k = 104 (the first 104 primes, p ≤ 104,729).

The realizer

The realizer identity rule

R(k) = θ(pk)·[ρS(k)/θ] with S = Σ w, so the reserve thrives (R → +∞) iff ρ exceeds ρc(w) = lim Σ w(pi)/θ(pk) — the weight's Cesàro log-average, when it converges. Calibration weights land exactly: w = log p realizes ρc = 1.000000 — sinking at ρ = 0.9, thriving at 1.1 — and w = ½ log p realizes 0.500000. Every nonnegative value is therefore trivially reachable (w = c·log p gives ρc = c), and the realizer re-expresses a prime log-average, never derives it. The content is which structured weights land on which named constants — the two families below.

Scope. Elementary (the drift calculus); calibrations exact in range.

verifier: explore_reserve_zoo.py

The rank family

The rank family rule

Weight wj(p) = log Pj(p−1), the j-th largest prime factor of p − 1 with multiplicity (P+ denotes P1, the largest). The factors partition log(p−1) exactly — Σj log Pj(p−1) = log(p−1) at every prime — so the thresholds sum to 1 in the limit: Σj ρc(j) = log φ/θ → 1, in range 0.999971. The spectrum is ordered, positive, decreasing: ρc(1..3) = 0.5791, 0.1931, 0.0980, tail (ranks ≥ 4) 0.1298. In the limit, under Elliott–Halberstam, it is the Poisson–Dirichlet(1) / Shepp–Lloyd spectrum of the Dickman ordered factorization (0.6243, 0.2096, 0.0883, …); the identification is open unconditionally. The integer positive control — the same machinery on unshifted nx — gives [0.6523, 0.2006, 0.0789], inside the PD bands and above the shifted value at j = 1: the straddle. Finite range confirms the ordered spectrum and the conservation, not the limit values.

Scope. The partition and the per-k conservation are exact, Σ → 1 elementary; the in-range values are observations. The PD identification is a theorem under Elliott–Halberstam — level of distribution 1 gives the full joint PD(1) law (Bharadwaj–Rodgers, arXiv:2402.11884; the j = 1 Dickman case Pomerance's conjecture, EH-proof Granville–Wang) — and open unconditionally: shifted primes hold level ½ (Bombieri–Vinogradov), buying restricted-support PD correlations only.

verifiers: explore_reserve_zoo.py, explore_ledger_threshold.py

The density family

The density family rule

Weight w(p) = log p · 1[E(p)] for an event E of prime density δ realizes ρc = δ: the threshold is the density itself (the log-weighted density equals the natural one). E = “p ≡ 1 mod 4” gives 0.4987 → ½ (Dirichlet). E = “2 is a primitive root mod p” gives 0.3749 — Artin's constant 0.3740 under GRH (Hooley), an infinite Kummer intersection rather than a single Chebotarev class. A density constant is a different kind than the rank family's Dickman size-averages; the one lever w reads both kinds.

Scope. Threshold = density is a rule; the in-range values are observations. The Artin value is Hooley's theorem under GRH; the ½ anchor is Dirichlet's theorem.

verifier: explore_reserve_zoo.py

The zoo in one chart

The three named irrationals are ordered and mutually distinct already in range: PD2 0.193 < Artin 0.375 < λGD 0.579.

weight w(p) threshold, k = 104 limitthe limit's status
log P3(p−1) 0.0980PD3 ≈ 0.0883 theorem under EH; open unconditionally
log P2(p−1) 0.1931PD2 ≈ 0.2096 theorem under EH; open unconditionally
log p · 1[2 primitive root] 0.3749Artin 0.3740 theorem under GRH (Hooley); open unconditionally
log p · 1[p ≡ 1 mod 4] 0.4987½ theorem (Dirichlet)
log P+(p−1) 0.5791λGD 0.6243 theorem under EH; open unconditionally
log p 1.0000001 exact (calibration)

The hinge

The size weight log P+(p−1) — rank 1 above — lands on a positive constant. A count-weighted sibling — earn ρ per step, pay 1 per λ-raise (the complexity ledger's jumps) — has for its threshold the limsup non-transparent density, degenerate at 0 exactly when the transparency density → 1: the open conjecture itself. One distinction explains the split. Here φ(pk#) = ∏ik(pi − 1) is the rung's unit count (its capacity) and λ(pk#) = lcm(pi − 1) its universal period (its dynamical complexity).

The collision hinge property

log φ counts every hit of every prime power in the shifted primes with multiplicity; log λ counts each hit power once. Their gap is the collision mass — prime powers dividing several shifted primes — and α = log λ/log φ = 1 − collision/log φ, exactly. In range the collision mass is 0.8349 of capacity (α = 0.1651), and nearly all of log λ is distinct large primes: the mass from primes above √pk is 0.9749, while the Linnik-guaranteed range — prime powers up to pk1/5 — carries 4.5·10−4. Elementary bounds sandwich α only between the Linnik floor 7.5·10−5 and 1, and α → 0 is equivalent to the transparency-density conjecture (the collision equivalence, elementary), so forcing it amounts to a lower bound on how much large shifted-prime factors repeat — the shifted-prime distribution circle. The hinge: the count reserve (lcm, distinct) loses the collision mass — its threshold is 0 iff transparency density → 1, the open conjecture itself; the size reserve (product, multiplicity) keeps every occurrence — its threshold is positive and stable in range (λGD under EH). One distinction, both fates.

Scope. The identity is exact (three computations agree to 10−6, k ≤ 104); the mass-locus is an observation; the equivalence is a theorem — it settles the question's shape, not its value.

verifiers: explore_ledger_threshold.py, explore_complexity_ledger.py, explore_collision_equivalence.py

The settled end

The abscissa reserve observation

A genuinely different solvency mechanism — the least s at which D(s) = Σp 1/P+(p−1)s converges, the abscissa σc, rather than an average — realizes no constant, and the reason is an inversion. The Cesàro log-weight reads the bulk of the P+ distribution (0.7456 of its mass on the rough set P+ > √(p−1)); the reciprocal weight reads the smooth tail (0.0461 rough — the band P+ ≤ 11 alone carries 0.7638 of D(2)). That tail is carried by smooth shifted primes — P+ = 2 exactly the Fermat primes, frozen at 5 in range; P+ = 3 the Pierpont primes — and Dk(2) climbs 2.25 → 12.66 with a non-vanishing tail. Divergence is a theorem at every computed exponent: friable-shifted-prime counts force D(s) = +∞ for every s < 1/0.2844 ≈ 3.52, so σc > 3.51 and only the endpoint σc = +∞ stays open — where Pierpont infinitude is a sufficient certificate, not an equivalent. The integer control isolates the shift at that endpoint: unshifted smooth counts are unconditionally infinite (3-smooth 100 vs the shifted 31 in range), so the integer endpoint is provable while the shifted one waits.

Scope. The inversion and the climb are observations, k ≤ 104. The fixed-s divergence is Lichtman's theorem (arXiv:2211.09641, Thm 1.1, won by extending the Bombieri–Friedlander–Iwaniec mean-value range; Baker–Harman 1998 before it); the endpoint is open.

verifier: explore_abscissa_reserve.py

One circle governs the whole page: the shifted-prime level of distribution — Bombieri–Vinogradov at ½, Elliott–Halberstam at 1, the Fouvry / Bombieri–Friedlander–Iwaniec range extensions between. The Cesàro average reads the bulk of P+(p−1), where the constants are open — the PD spectrum under EH, Artin under GRH. The abscissa reads the smooth tail, where the same circle's theorems already force degeneracy, leaving existence only the endpoint. The two ways to ask whether a designed economy is solvent read the two ends of one distribution — and the tail end, where existence lives, is the one the theorems already own.